There comes a time in the life of an adult where one questions what it is that we think about the "God" business.
I used to think God was this beneficial energy that looked after me, protected me, guided me. I guess I was projecting a paternal/maternal vision into it.
Then I noticed how the yogis of old times, the sages and rishis, went about trying different things to find the bliss of liberation, the extasis that is more than you could ever imagine, the type that makes someone like Ramana Maharshi sit outdoors among snakes, be bitten, and not even notice, only these masters went about trying to find this trasncendental (for lack of a better word) experience, leaving any idea of God out of the equation.
Take for example Mr. Sinha, who in the book "The Gita as It Was", says that Patanjali never mentioned anything about Ishvara (God) in the Yoga Sutras. He says the concept was not even around at that time! and concludes it was "interpolated" (loving that new word) centuries after in order to what? Suit the temperament of the devotion-ally inclined?
Of the authors that think that Patanjali did mentioned Ishvara, one of them, Mircea Eliade (Yoga Immortality and Freedom) gives me a more reassuring way of looking at it. Reassuring that is as I step into the territory of not-knowing and letting go of my own, childish perhaps, ideas of what God was:
"God does not submit to being summoned by rituals of devotion or faith in his mercy, but his essence instinctively "collaborates" as it were, with the Self that seeks emancipation through Yoga." [my bold]
Aha! so maybe there is a energy that is protective, perhaps I don't quite have to let go of that cozy feeling after all. I want to believe there is an energetic pattern that collaborates in helping us yogis find our way towards eternal peace and discrimination, to be Ramana Maharshis, Patanjalis, Buddhas.
Swamiji (commenting on Yoga Sutra 2.45) says that God has been personified and put on a pedestal due to our lack of direct experience [my bold again]. But all it takes is for us to expand our consciousness to realize the universal self. What I used to think of as God.
So we just projected into this God idea whatever we may have out of not being able to directly experience the bliss that is already within us. Hm.
I first had this terrifying glimpse that God was just like Santa Clause while reading Goenka's 1992 very long speech (which was pointed to me by Tom, thank you). [Goenka is the man behind free meditation Vipassana retreats around the world today]
It took place at the Kayvalya institute out of all places, and I say out of all places because in the speech he refutes and criticizes yoga systems for turning Patanjali into a "clown" and making people do asanas and breathing retention that he [Patnajali] never talked about. He said this while at the institute that probably has the most research on pranayama in the globe and a world authority in residency, O.P. Tiwariji. But I digress.
He also makes fun of any God inclusion in the Yoga Sutras and emphasizes how the system of Patanjali, which in his eyes is exactly what Vipassana is, there is none of it! Just sitting, just watching. Nothing else.
He is right. Patanjali and Vipassana (which means seeing things as they are) do propose the exact same thing.
I have my theory about it, as usual, I do not think one can shockingly just go ahead and sit 10 hours expecting the mind to be quiet if one is sick. I have been to retreats and seen the people in the back unable to sit straight, propped with so many pillows, sometimes with two chairs, you can barely see them. When it comes to sited meditation, if there is not proper preparation things can get ugly.
And so I prefer Patanjali's approach as developed by lineages coming after him (Krishnamacharya Kuvalyananda and all the rest of them) which do include asana and pranayama. Although I confess that I love the quiet and focused time of Vipassana retreats, but that is because I go prepared, with a body that actually CAN sit steady and comfortably and breathe relatively well. At least some of the time.
Anyways. All of this had me thinking about the no-God business. Just practice.
Strange note to end 2011 on. Or, maybe that is what the Mayans meant? Finally realizing that Santa isn't Santa, it was ourselves all along, all we have to do is inquire within.
We must just focus and keep trying to focus (six limb) till we fall into meditation (seventh limb) and our attention flows into just one object like oil pouring from a pipe, intensely and steadily.
Then bliss. (Eight limb)
Wish you bliss for 2012
RELATED:
Shocking! The Gita Is Not What We Thought It Was!
I used to think God was this beneficial energy that looked after me, protected me, guided me. I guess I was projecting a paternal/maternal vision into it.
![]() |
| But I thought... |
![]() |
| Rishis trying their things to find bliss |
Of the authors that think that Patanjali did mentioned Ishvara, one of them, Mircea Eliade (Yoga Immortality and Freedom) gives me a more reassuring way of looking at it. Reassuring that is as I step into the territory of not-knowing and letting go of my own, childish perhaps, ideas of what God was:
"God does not submit to being summoned by rituals of devotion or faith in his mercy, but his essence instinctively "collaborates" as it were, with the Self that seeks emancipation through Yoga." [my bold]
![]() |
| Ramana Maharshi |
So we just projected into this God idea whatever we may have out of not being able to directly experience the bliss that is already within us. Hm.
I first had this terrifying glimpse that God was just like Santa Clause while reading Goenka's 1992 very long speech (which was pointed to me by Tom, thank you). [Goenka is the man behind free meditation Vipassana retreats around the world today]
It took place at the Kayvalya institute out of all places, and I say out of all places because in the speech he refutes and criticizes yoga systems for turning Patanjali into a "clown" and making people do asanas and breathing retention that he [Patnajali] never talked about. He said this while at the institute that probably has the most research on pranayama in the globe and a world authority in residency, O.P. Tiwariji. But I digress.
He also makes fun of any God inclusion in the Yoga Sutras and emphasizes how the system of Patanjali, which in his eyes is exactly what Vipassana is, there is none of it! Just sitting, just watching. Nothing else.
| Just sit! |
I have my theory about it, as usual, I do not think one can shockingly just go ahead and sit 10 hours expecting the mind to be quiet if one is sick. I have been to retreats and seen the people in the back unable to sit straight, propped with so many pillows, sometimes with two chairs, you can barely see them. When it comes to sited meditation, if there is not proper preparation things can get ugly.
And so I prefer Patanjali's approach as developed by lineages coming after him (Krishnamacharya Kuvalyananda and all the rest of them) which do include asana and pranayama. Although I confess that I love the quiet and focused time of Vipassana retreats, but that is because I go prepared, with a body that actually CAN sit steady and comfortably and breathe relatively well. At least some of the time.
Anyways. All of this had me thinking about the no-God business. Just practice.
Strange note to end 2011 on. Or, maybe that is what the Mayans meant? Finally realizing that Santa isn't Santa, it was ourselves all along, all we have to do is inquire within.
We must just focus and keep trying to focus (six limb) till we fall into meditation (seventh limb) and our attention flows into just one object like oil pouring from a pipe, intensely and steadily.
Then bliss. (Eight limb)
Wish you bliss for 2012
RELATED:
Shocking! The Gita Is Not What We Thought It Was!
Follow me on Twitter or subscribe at: ClaudiaYoga.com





















.jpg)



